Land & Planning Platform

In development · Design partners wanted

A system of record for land
and master planning

Most planning authorities and master developers do not have a land problem or a mapping problem. They have a record problem — the authoritative answer to who holds what, what was consented, what was built, and who decided it, lives across a dozen systems and several people's memory.

Where this actually is

The platform is in development. This page is not selling a finished product, and there is no subscription to buy today. What is available now is a paid design-partner engagement — we build the first modules around one real statutory process, in one real organisation, and that organisation gets the platform shaped around how it actually works rather than how a vendor imagined it.

We hold the same rule for the platform that we hold for every resource in the catalogue: nothing is sold before the thing being sold exists.

What is being built

Six modules, in build order

Each is independently useful. A design partner starts with one or two, not all six.

01

Land record

Parcels, addresses, tenure, designations and lifecycle states, with a named custodian for every dataset and a history that survives staff turnover.

  • Cadastral fabric
  • Address gazetteer
  • Designations
  • Custodianship
02

Development control

Application intake through consultation, assessment, decision and appeal — modelled as the process it actually is, with statutory deadlines tracked rather than remembered.

  • Intake
  • Consultation
  • Assessment
  • Decision & conditions
03

Master plan management

Scheme versions, phasing and the consented boundary, so compliance is measured against what was actually approved rather than against the latest drawing.

  • Scheme versions
  • Phasing
  • Consent boundary
  • Compliance
04

Site suitability

Constraint screening and weighted assessment with the weights written down, so an allocation decision can be defended when it is challenged.

  • Constraints
  • Weighted MCA
  • Sensitivity
  • Audit of method
05

Field & inspection

Mobile capture with coded condition and defect recording, geotagged evidence, and an evidence chain that still holds years later.

  • Mobile capture
  • Condition
  • Defects
  • Evidence chain
06

Governance & assurance

Quality scorecards, lineage, access review and an append-only audit trail — who decided what, on which version of which dataset, and when.

  • Quality scoring
  • Lineage
  • Access review
  • Audit trail

Built on open source

No vendor lock-in on the analysis layer

The mapping and analysis surface is GeoLibre, an MIT-licensed, cloud-native GIS platform with over a thousand geoprocessing tools that run client-side. We embed and configure it; we do not fork it and we do not charge you for it.

That matters for two reasons. Your analysts can use the same tooling outside our platform, at no cost, forever. And because processing runs in the browser, sensitive data can be analysed without leaving the machine it sits on.

GeoLibre is an independent open-source project. We are users and integrators of it, not its authors.

What we build around it

  • The authoritative land record, in your own database
  • Statutory workflow with tracked deadlines
  • Server-enforced authorisation, not interface hiding
  • Append-only audit of every decision
  • Migration from whatever you hold today
  • The standards and governance to keep it authoritative

A map is the window onto the record. The record is the asset.

Deployment

Your data, in your jurisdiction

Private instance

Your own deployment and your own database, hosted in a region you nominate.

On your infrastructure

Deployed inside your estate where land records cannot leave it.

Managed by us

We run it, with a stated response commitment and a documented recovery plan.

The first step

Land data assessment

Available now, independently of the platform. A structured review of what land and planning data you hold, how good it is, and what would have to be true before any system could be authoritative on top of it.

1

Inventory of land, address and planning datasets, with custodianship gaps identified

2

Quality scored across completeness, positional and attribute accuracy, currency and lineage

3

Your statutory process mapped as it actually runs, not as documented

4

A prioritised route to an authoritative record, costed and sequenced

Most organisations find the assessment worth having on its own. It is also how we establish whether a design partnership makes sense for either side.

Design partners

We are looking for a small number of planning authorities, master developers and land-holding organisations to build this with. You get the platform shaped around your process and preferential terms; we get a real statutory process to build against instead of an assumed one.

Direct: Support@thegeolab.digital